Preview

Problems of Endocrinology

Advanced search

Insulin growth factor-I-based dosing of growth hormone therapy in children: a randomized, controlled study

https://doi.org/10.14341/probl200955227-34

Abstract

Weight-based dosing of growth hormone (GH) is the standard of therapy in short children although insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) is a major mediator of GH actions on growth. Objective: to test whether the IGF-I levels achieved during GH therapy are determinants of the growth responses to GH therapy. This was a two-year open-label, randomized IGF-I concentration-controlled trial. Prepubertal short children [n = 172; mean age 7.53 years; mean height SD score (HT-SDS - 2.64] with low IGF-I levels (mean IGF-I SDS - 3.56) were randomized to receive one of two GH dose-titration arms in which GH dosage was titrated to achieve an IGF-I SDS at the mean [IGF(low) group, n = 70) or the upper limit of the normal range [+2 SDS, IGF(high) group, n = 68] or to a comparison group of conventional GH dose of 40 mg/kg/day (n = 34). The multicenter study was performed in the outpatient centers. The primary outcome measure was to determine changes in HT-SDS during 2-year therapy. One hundred and forty-seven patients completed the trial. Target IGF-I levels were achieved in the dose-titration arms within 6-9 months. The changes in HT-SDS were +1.0, +1.1, and +1.6 for conventional, IGF(low), and IGF(high), respectively, with IGF(high) showing significantly greater linear growth response (p < 0.001), compared with the two other groups). The IGF-I(high) arm required higher doses ( > 2.5 times) than the IGF-I(low) arm, and these GH doses were highly variable (20-346 mg/kg/day). Multivariate analyses suggest that the rise in IGF-I SDS significantly impacted height outcome along with the GH dose and the pretreatment peak-stimulated GH level. IGF-I-based GH dosing is clinically feasible and allows maintaining serum IGF-I concentrations within the desired target range. Titrating the GH dose to achieve higher IGF-I target results in improved growth responses, although at higher average GH doses.

About the Authors

P Cohen

Mattel Childrens Hospital at UCLA


United States

Department of pediatric Endocrinology



A D Rogol

University of Virginia


United States

Department of Pediatrics



C P Howard

Novo Nordisk Inc.


United States

Medical Department



G M Bright

Novo Nordisk Inc.


United States

Medical Department



A.-M Kappelgaard

Novo Nordisk A/S


Denmark

Scientific Marketing GHT



R G Rosenfeld

Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health


United States

Medical Affairs



References

1. Abuzzahab M. J., Schneider A., Goddard A. et al. // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2003. - Vol. 349. - P. 2211-2222.

2. Baker J., Liu J. P., Robertson E. J., Efstratiadis A. // Cell. - 1993. - Vol. 75. - P. 73-82.

3. Boguszewski M., Jansson C., Rosberg S., Albertsson-Wikland K. // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. - 1996. - Vol. 81. - P. 3902-3908.

4. Chan J. M., Stampfer M. J., Giovannucci E. et al. // Science. - 1998. - Vol. 279. - P. 563-566.

5. Cohen P., Clemmons D. R., Rosenfeld R. G. // Growth Horm. IGF Res. - 2000. - Vol. 10. - P. 297-305.

6. Cohen P., Bright G. M., Rogol A. D. et al. // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. - 2002. - Vol. 87. - P. 90-98.

7. Consensus Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Growth Hormone (GH) Deficiency in Childhood and Adolescence: Summary Statement of the GH Research Society // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. - 2000. - Vol. 85. - P. 3990-3993.

8. Critical Evaluation of the Safety of Recombinant Human Growth Hormone Administration: Statement from the Growth Hormone Research Society // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. - 2001. - Vol. 86. - P. 1868-1870.

9. de Muinck Keizer-Schrama S. M., Rikken B., Wynne H. J. et al. // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. - 1992. - Vol. 74. - P. 898-905.

10. Dos S. C., Essioux L., Teinturier C. et al. // Nat. Genet. - 2004. - Vol. 36. - P. 720-724.

11. Frasier S. D., Costin G., Lippe B. M. et al. // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. - 1981. - Vol. 53. - P. 1213-1217.

12. Gharib H., Cook D. M., Saenger P. H. et al. // Endocr. Pract. - 2003. - Vol. 9. - P. 64-76.

13. Giustina A., Veldhuis J. D. // Endocr. Rev. - 1998. - Vol. 19. - P. 717-797.

14. Goddard A. D., Covello R., Luoh S. M. et al. // N. Engl. J. Med. - 1995. - Vol. 333. - P. 1093-1098.

15. Greulich W., Pyle S. Radiographic Atlas of Skletal Development of the Hand and Wrist. - Stanford, 1959.

16. Hankinson S. E., Willett W. C., Golditz G. A. et al. // Lancet. - 1998. - Vol. 351. - P. 1393-1396.

17. Hoffman A. R., Strasburger C. J., Zagar A. et al. // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. - 2004. - Vol. 89. - P. 3224-3233.

18. Kamp G. A., Zwinderman A. H., Van Doorn J. et al. // Clin. Enocrinol. (Oxford). - 2002. - Vol. 57. - P. 315-325.

19. Leschek E. W., Rose S. R., Yanovski J. A. et al. // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. - 2004. - Vol. 89. - P. 3140-3148.

20. Liu J. P., Baker J., Perkins A. S. et al. // Cell. - 1993. - Vol. 75. - P. 59-72.

21. Lupu F., Terwilliger J. D., Lee K. et al. // Dev. Biol. - 2001. - Vol. 229. - P. 141-162.

22. Ma J., Pollak M. N., Giovannucei E. et al. // J. Natl. Cancer. Inst. - 1999. - Vol. 91. - P. 620-625.

23. Marshall W. A., Tanner J. M. // Arch. Dis. Child. - 1969. - Vol. 44. - P. 291-303.

24. Marshall W. A., Tanner J. M. // Arch. Dis. Child. - 1970. - Vol. 45. - P. 13-23.

25. Mauras N., Attie K. M., Reiter E. O. et al. // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. - 2000. - Vol. 85. - P. 3653-3660.

26. Ogilvy-Stuart A. L., Gleeson H. // Drug. Saf. - 2004. - Vol. 27. - P. 369-382.

27. Park P., Cohen P. // Growth Horm. IGF Res. - 2005. - Vol. 15. - Suppl. A. - P. S13-S20.

28. Raben M. S. // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. - 1958. - Vol. 18. - P. 901-903.

29. Raben M. S. // N. Engl. J. Med. - 1962. - Vol. 266. - P. 82-86.

30. Ranke M. B., Linberg A., Cowell C. T. et al. // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. - 2003. - Vol. 88. - P. 125-131.

31. Ranke M. B., Lindberg A., Martin D. D. et al. // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. - 2003. - Vol. 88. - P. 4748-4753.

32. Schonau E., Westermann F., Rauch F. et al. // Eur. J. Endocrinol. - 2001. - Vol. 144. - P. 13-20.

33. Sklar C. A., Mertens A. C., Mitby P. et al. // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. - 2002. - Vol. 87. - P. 3136-3141.

34. Swerdlow A. J., Higgins C. D., Adlard P., Preece M. A. // Lancet. - 2002. - Vol. 360. - P. 273-277.

35. Vance M. L., Mauras N. // N. Engl. J. Med. - 1999. - Vol. 341. - P. 1206-1216.

36. Wit J. M., Rekers-Mombarg L. T., Cutler G. B. et al. // J. Pediatr. - 2005. - Vol. 146. - P. 45-53.

37. Woods K. A., Camacho H., Barter D. et al. // Acta Paediatr. - 1995. - Suppl. 423. - P. 39-45.

38. Woods K. A., Camacho-Hubner C., Savage M. O., Clark A. J. // N. Engl. J. Med. - 1996. - Vol. 335. - P. 1363-1367.

39. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki // J. A. M. A. - 1997. - Vol. 277. - P. 925-926.


Review

For citations:


Cohen P., Rogol A.D., Howard C.P., Bright G.M., Kappelgaard A., Rosenfeld R.G. Insulin growth factor-I-based dosing of growth hormone therapy in children: a randomized, controlled study. Problems of Endocrinology. 2009;55(2):27-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/probl200955227-34

Views: 6287


ISSN 0375-9660 (Print)
ISSN 2308-1430 (Online)