Clinical and laboratory features of hereditary pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma
https://doi.org/10.14341/probl12834
Abstract
The widespread introduction of genetic testing in recent years has made it possible to determine that more than a third of cases of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPPGs) are caused by germline mutations. Despite the variety of catecholamine-producing tumors manifestations, there is a sufficient number of clinical and laboratory landmarks that suggest a hereditary genesis of the disease and even a specific syndrome. These include a family history, age of patient, presence of concomitant conditions, and symptoms of the disease. Considering that each of the mutations is associated with certain diseases that often determine tactics of treatment and examination of a patient, e.g. high risk of various malignancies. Awareness of the practitioner on the peculiarities of the course of family forms of PPPGs will allow improving the tactics of managing these patients.
The article provides up-to-date information on the prevalence of hereditary PPPGs. The modern views on the pathogenesis of the disease induced by different mutations are presented. The main hereditary syndromes associated with PPPGs are described, including multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2A and 2B, type 1 neurofibromatosis, von Hippel-Lindau syndrome, hereditary paraganglioma syndrome, as well as clinical and laboratory features of the tumor in these conditions. The main positions on the necessity of genetic screening in patients with PPPGs are given.
About the Authors
D. V. RebrovaRussian Federation
Dina V. Rebrova, MD, PhD
SPIN-код: 6284-9008
154 Fontanka river embankment, 190103, Saint Petersburg,
N. V. Vorokhobina
Russian Federation
Natalya V. Vorokhobina, MD, PhD, Prof.
SPIN-код: 4062-6409
Saint Petersburg
E. N. Imyanitov
Russian Federation
Evgeny N. Imyanitov, MD, PhD, Prof., Corresponding Member of RAS
SPIN-код: 1909-7323
Saint Petersburg
V F. Rusakov
Russian Federation
Vladimir F. Rusakov, MD, PhD
SPIN-код: 1345-3530
Saint Petersburg
L. M. Krasnov
Russian Federation
Leonid M. Krasnov, MD, PhD
SPIN-код: 355848
Saint Petersburg
I. V. Sleptsov
Russian Federation
Ilya V. Sleptsov, MD, PhD
SPIN-код: 2481-4331
Saint Petersburg
R. A. Chernikov
Russian Federation
Roman A. Chernikov, MD, PhD
SPIN-код: 7093-1088
Saint Petersburg
E. A. Fedorov
Russian Federation
Elisey A. Fedorov, MD, PhD
SPIN-код: 5673-2633
Saint Petersburg
A. A. Semenov
Russian Federation
Arseny A. Semenov, MD, PhD
SPIN-код: 6724-2170
Saint Petersburg
I. K. Chinchuk
Russian Federation
Igor K. Chinchuk, MD, PhD
SPIN-код: 6252-6710
Saint Petersburg
I. V. Sablin
Russian Federation
Ilya V. Sablin, MD
Saint Petersburg
M. A. Alekseev
Russian Federation
Mikhail A. Alekseev, MD
SPIN-код: 4342-4590
Saint Petersburg
O. V. Kuleshov
Russian Federation
Oleg V. Kuleshov, MD, PhD
Saint Petersburg
Ju. N Fedotov
Russian Federation
Jury N. Fedotov, MD, PhD
SPIN-код: 4833-3371
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Mel'nichenko G.A., Troshina E.A., Bel'tsevich D.G., et al. Russian Association of Endocrinologists clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Endocrine Surgery. 2015;9(3):15-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/serg2015315-33
2. Ilias I, Thomopoulos C. Addressing delays in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab. 2019;14(5):359-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/17446651.2019.1657007
3. Stolk RF, Bakx C, Mulder J, Timmers HJLM, et al. Is the excess cardiovascular morbidity in pheochromocytoma related to blood pressure or to catecholamines? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(3):1100-1106. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-3669
4. Geroula A, Deutschbein T, Langton K, et al. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: clinical feature-based disease probability in relation to catecholamine biochemistry and reason for disease suspicion. Eur J Endocrinol. 2019;181(4):409-420. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-19-0159
5. Klingler PJ, Fox TP, Menke DM, et al. Pheochromocytoma in an incidentally discovered asymptomatic cystic adrenal mass. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75(5):517-520. https://doi.org/10.4065/75.5.517
6. Lenders JWM, Duh Q-Y, Eisenhofer G, et al. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(6):1915-1942. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-1498
7. Rebrova DV, Rusakov VF, Fedorov EA et al. Rare case of pheochromocytoma with calcitonin hypersecretion. Pharmateca. 2021;28(4):90-98. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18565/pharmateca.2021.4.90-98
8. Shafigullina ZR, Petrova MM, Shustov SB, et al. A case of combination ACTH-ectopic Cushing's syndrome and pheochromocytoma. Russian Family Doctor. 2013;17(4):43-46. (In Russ.)
9. Patel D, Phay JE, Yen TWF, et al. Update on Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma from the SSO Endocrine/Head and Neck Disease-Site Work Group. Part 1 of 2: Advances in Pathogenesis and Diagnosis of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(5):1329-1337. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08220-3
10. Aygun N, Uludag M. Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma: From Epidemiology to Clinical Findings. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2020;54(2):159-168. https://doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2020.18794
11. Van Der Horst-Schrivers ANA, Osinga TE, Kema IP, et al. Dopamine excess in patients with head and neck paragangliomas. Anticancer Res. 2010;30(12):5153-5158.
12. Yasunari K, Kohno M, Minami M, et al. A dopamine-secreting pheochromocytoma. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2000;36 Suppl 2:S75-77. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005344-200000006-00016
13. Else T, Greenberg S, Fishbein L. Hereditary Paraganglioma-Pheochromocytoma Syndromes. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, et al., eds. GeneReviews®. University of Washington, Seattle; 1993. Accessed June 19, 2021. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1548
14. Katabathina VS, Rajebi H, Chen M, et al. Genetics and imaging of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: current update. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020;45(4):928-944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02044-w
15. Fishbein L. Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma: Is This a Genetic Disorder? Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019;21(9):104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-019-1184-y
16. Dahia PLM. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma pathogenesis: learning from genetic heterogeneity. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(2):108-119. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3648
17. Granberg D, Juhlin CC, Falhammar H. Metastatic Pheochromocytomas and Abdominal Paragangliomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106(5):e1937-e1952. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa982
18. Antonio K, Valdez MMN, Mercado-Asis L, Taïeb D, Pacak K. Pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma: recent updates in genetics, biochemistry, immunohistochemistry, metabolomics, imaging and therapeutic options. Gland Surg. 2020;9(1):105-123. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2019.10.25
19. Nölting S, Ullrich M, Pietzsch J, et al. Current Management of Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma: A Guide for the Practicing Clinician in the Era of Precision Medicine. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(10):E1505. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11101505
20. Fishbein L, Leshchiner I, Walter V, et al. Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma. Cancer Cell. 2017;31(2):181-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2017.01.001
21. Lloyd R, Osamura R, Kloppel G, Rosai J, eds. WHO Classification of Tumors of Endocrine Organs edited by Lloyd RV, Osamura RY, Kloppel G, Rosai J. - 4th Edition. 4th ed. IARC; 2017.
22. Buffet A, Burnichon N, Favier J, Gimenez-Roqueplo A-P. An overview of 20 years of genetic studies in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;34(2):101416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2020.101416
23. McDonnell JE, Gild ML, Clifton-Bligh RJ, Robinson BG. Multiple endocrine neoplasia: an update. Intern Med J. 2019;49(8):954-961. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.14394
24. Chen H, Sippel RS, O’Dorisio MS, et al. The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society consensus guideline for the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumors: pheochromocytoma, paraganglioma, and medullary thyroid cancer. Pancreas. 2010;39(6):775-783. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181ebb4f0
25. Makri A, Akshintala S, Derse-Anthony C, et al. Pheochromocytoma in Children and Adolescents With Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2B. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(1):7-12. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-00705
26. Galan SR, Kann PH. Genetics and molecular pathogenesis of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013;78(2):165-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.12071
27. Wohllk N, Schweizer H, Erlic Z, et al. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;24(3):371-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2010.02.001
28. Wells SA, Asa SL, Dralle H, et al. Revised American Thyroid Association guidelines for the management of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 2015;25(6):567-610. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2014.0335
29. Yasir M, Mulji NJ, Kasi A. Multiple Endocrine Neoplasias Type 2. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2021. Accessed June 20, 2021. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519054
30. Anderson JL, Gutmann DH. Neurofibromatosis type 1. Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;132:75-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62702-5.00004-4
31. Williams VC, Lucas J, Babcock MA, et al. Neurofibromatosis type 1 revisited. Pediatrics. 2009;123(1):124-133. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-3204
32. Zinnamosca L, Petramala L, Cotesta D, et al. Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and pheochromocytoma: prevalence, clinical and cardiovascular aspects. Arch Dermatol Res. 2011;303(5):317-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-010-1090-z
33. Képénékian L, Mognetti T, Lifante J-C, et al. Interest of systematic screening of pheochromocytoma in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;175(4):335-344. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-16-0233
34. Zografos GN, Vasiliadis GK, Zagouri F, et al. Pheochromocytoma associated with neurofibromatosis type 1: concepts and current trends. World J Surg Oncol. 2010;8:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-8-14
35. Jafri M, Maher ER. The genetics of phaeochromocytoma: using clinical features to guide genetic testing. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;166(2):151-158. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-11-0497
36. Shinall MC, Solórzano CC. Pheochromocytoma in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: When Should it Be Suspected? Endocr Pract. 2014;20(8):792-796. https://doi.org/10.4158/EP13417.OR
37. Aronow ME, Wiley HE, Gaudric A, et al. VON HIPPEL-LINDAU DISEASE: Update on Pathogenesis and Systemic Aspects. Retina. 2019;39(12):2243-2253. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002555
38. Maher ER, Neumann HP, Richard S. von Hippel-Lindau disease: a clinical and scientific review. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011;19(6):617-623. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2010.175
39. Opocher G, Schiavi F. Genetics of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;24(6):943-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2010.05.001
40. Neumann HPH, Young WF, Eng C. Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(6):552-565. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1806651
41. Neumann HPH, Pawlu C, Peczkowska M, et al. Distinct clinical features of paraganglioma syndromes associated with SDHB and SDHD gene mutations. JAMA. 2004;292(8):943-951. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.8.943
42. Schiavi F, Demattè S, Cecchini ME, et al. The endemic paraganglioma syndrome type 1: origin, spread, and clinical expression. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(4):E637-641. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-2597
43. Pasini B, Stratakis CA. SDH mutations in tumorigenesis and inherited endocrine tumours: lesson from the phaeochromocytoma-paraganglioma syndromes. J Intern Med. 2009;266(1):19-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2009.02111.x
44. Hensen EF, Bayley J-P. Recent advances in the genetics of SDH-related paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma. Fam Cancer. 2011;10(2):355-363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-010-9402-1
45. Burnichon N, Rohmer V, Amar L, et al. The succinate dehydrogenase genetic testing in a large prospective series of patients with paragangliomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(8):2817-2827. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-2504
46. Brouwers FM, Eisenhofer G, Tao JJ, et al. High frequency of SDHB germline mutations in patients with malignant catecholamine-producing paragangliomas: implications for genetic testing. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(11):4505-4509. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-0423
47. Korpershoek E, Favier J, Gaal J, et al. SDHA immunohistochemistry detects germline SDHA gene mutations in apparently sporadic paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(9):E1472-1476. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-1043
48. Muth A, Crona J, Gimm O, et al. Genetic testing and surveillance guidelines in hereditary pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. J Intern Med. 2019;285(2):187-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12869
49. Yao L, Schiavi F, Cascon A, et al. Spectrum and prevalence of FP/TMEM127 gene mutations in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. JAMA. 2010;304(23):2611-2619. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1830
50. Qin Y, Yao L, King EE, et al. Germline mutations in TMEM127 confer susceptibility to pheochromocytoma. Nat Genet. 2010;42(3):229-233. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.533
51. Comino-Méndez I, Gracia-Aznárez FJ, Schiavi F, et al. Exome sequencing identifies MAX mutations as a cause of hereditary pheochromocytoma. Nat Genet. 2011;43(7):663-667. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.861
52. Turchini J, Cheung VKY, Tischler AS, et al. Pathology and genetics of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Histopathology. 2018;72(1):97-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13402
53. Zhang C, Li L, Zhang Y, Zeng C. Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Cancer: Recent Insights Into Mechanisms and Systemic Treatment. Front Oncol. 2021;11:686556. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.686556
54. Brito JP, Asi N, Bancos I, et al. Testing for germline mutations in sporadic pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma: a systematic review. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2015;82(3):338-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.12530
55. Jiménez C, Cote G, Arnold A, Gagel RF. Review: Should patients with apparently sporadic pheochromocytomas or paragangliomas be screened for hereditary syndromes? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(8):2851-2858. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-2178
Supplementary files
|
1. Рисунок 1. Основные клинико-лабораторные признаки генетических синдромов, ассоциированных с феохромоцитомой/параганглиомой, и типичная характеристика опухолей. Примечание: ЩЖ — щитовидная железа; ЖКТ — желудочно-кишечный тракт; ЦНС — центральная нервная система. | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(778KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
Review
For citations:
Rebrova D.V., Vorokhobina N.V., Imyanitov E.N., Rusakov V.F., Krasnov L.M., Sleptsov I.V., Chernikov R.A., Fedorov E.A., Semenov A.A., Chinchuk I.K., Sablin I.V., Alekseev M.A., Kuleshov O.V., Fedotov J.N. Clinical and laboratory features of hereditary pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Problems of Endocrinology. 2022;68(1):8-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/probl12834

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).