Effect of preoperative bisphosphonate therapy on bone mineral density in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism one year after parathyroidectomy
https://doi.org/10.14341/probl13574
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The main treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is parathyroidectomy (PTE), conservative therapy, including bisphosphonates, can be used for preoperative correction of hypercalcemia, as well as to improve bone tissue condition among individuals for whom surgery should be postponed or cannot be performed due to high perioperative risks. The question of the effect of bisphosphonates on bone tissue after surgery remains open.
AIM: To study the effect of preoperative bisphosphonate therapy on BMD parameters assessed in DXA and 3D-DXA in patients with PHPT one year after radical PTE.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted on the basis of the Department of pathology of the parathyroid glands and disorders of mineral metabolism of "Endocrinology Research Center" state-funded research facility of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. The study included 50 patients (2 men, 48 women), divided into two groups depending on the presence or absence of preoperative bisphosphonate (BF) therapy. The methods of DXA and 3D-DXA using 3D-Shaper Medical software were used to evaluate BMD and bone microarchitectonics. The statistical analysis was performed using the R language and the Statistica v.13 package.
RESULTS: At the time of the disease’s manifestation, both groups were comparable in terms of the main indicators of calcium phosphorus metabolism, with the exception of the level of beta-crosslapse, which was higher in the group without preoperative BPh therapy (p<0,001). There were also no differences in the parameters of DXA and 3D-DXA. After surgery, both groups showed a comparable increase in BMD based on the results of DXA in the main parts of the skeleton and 3D-DXA in the femur. Changes at the level of the statistical trend were obtained for the 3D-DXA parameters, the final absolute values of which were slightly higher in the second group, including the thickness of the cortical layer in the femur as a whole and in the neck. When comparing the results of DXA before and after PTE in patients receiving BPh, statistically significant differences in absolute BMD values were obtained only in the lumbar spine (p<0,001).According to 3D-DXA data, statistically significant differences were found only in the volume of mineral density of the trabecular bone of the femur as a whole (p=0,001).
When analyzing up to — in the second group, statistically significant differences in absolute BMD values were observed in the lumbar region (p<0,001), in the hip as a whole (p<0,001) and in its neck (p=0,001).According to 3D-DXA data, statistically significant differences were found in three of the eight analyzed indicators, the volume of mineral density of the trabecular bone of the femur as a whole and in the neck (p<0,001 for both), as well as the volume of mineral density of the cortical bone in the neck, (p=0,001).
CONCLUSION: The 3D-DXA method allows us to evaluate not only BMD, but also its microarchitectonics, which is important for predicting the risk of fractures in patients with PHPT. Studies have shown that preoperative BPh therapy can negatively affect the recovery of BMD after PTE, especially in cortical bone tissue. Further studies are needed to confirm these data and clarify the effect of CF on the postoperative course of PHPT.
About the Authors
A. P. Pershina-MiliutinaRussian Federation
Anastasiia P. Pershina-Miliutina, MD
11 Dm.Ulyanova street, 117036 Moscow
A. K. Eremkina
Russian Federation
Anna K. Eremkina, MD, PhD
Moscow
I. D. Ozhimalov
Russian Federation
Ilia D. Ozhimalov
Moscow
А. V. Khairieva
Russian Federation
Angelina V. Khairieva, MD
Moscow
A. M. Gorbacheva
Russian Federation
Anna M. Gorbacheva, MD
Moscow
S. V. Ronzhina
Russian Federation
Svetlana V. Ronzhina
Moscow
N. G. Mokrysheva
Russian Federation
Natalia G. Mokrysheva, MD, PhD, Professor
Moscow
References
1. Khan AA, Hanley DA, Rizzoli R, Bollerslev J, Young JE, et al. Primary hyperparathyroidism: review and recommendations on evaluation, diagnosis, and management. A Canadian and international consensus. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(1):1-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3716-2
2. Fraser WD. Hyperparathyroidism. Lancet. 2009;374(9684):145-58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60507-9
3. Mokrysheva NG, Mirnaya SS, Dobreva EA, Maganeva IS, Kovaleva EV, et al. Primary hyperparathyroidism in Russia according to the registry. Problems of Endocrinology. 2019;65(5):300-310 (In Russ.). doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/probl10126
4. Mokrysheva NG, Eremkina AK, Elfimova AR, Kovaleva EV, Miliutina AP, et al. The Russian registry of primary hyperparathyroidism, latest update. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1203437. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1203437
5. Dedov II, Melnichenko GA, Mokrysheva NG, Andreeva EN, Antsiferov MB, et al. Draft of clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism in adult patients. Endocrine Surgery. 2022;16(4):5-54. (In Russ.). doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/serg12790
6. Drake MT, Clarke BL, Khosla S. Bisphosphonates: mechanism of action and role in clinical practice. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83(9):1032-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.4065/83.9.1032
7. Orr LE, Zhou H, Zhu CY, Haigh PI, Adams AL, Yeh MW. Skeletal effects of combined medical and surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery. 2020;167(1):144-148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2019.04.059
8. Eller-Vainicher C, Filopanti M, Palmieri S, Ulivieri FM, Morelli V, et al. Bone quality, as measured by trabecular bone score, in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;169(2):155-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-13-0305
9. Ye Z, Silverberg SJ, Sreekanta A, Tong K, Wang Y, et al. The Efficacy and Safety of Medical and Surgical Therapy in Patients With Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Bone Miner Res. 2022;37(11):2351-2372. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4685
10. Hangge PT, Norain A, Butterfield RJ 3rd, Wasif N, Cronin PA, Stucky CH. Parathyroidectomy in the elderly is beneficial and safe with similar improvements in postoperative bone mineral density. Am J Surg. 2022;224(1 Pt A):147-152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.04.031
11. Kongsaree N, Thanyajaroen T, Dechates B, Therawit P, Mahikul W, Ngaosuwan K. Skeletal Effect of Parathyroidectomy on Patients With Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024;109(10):e1922-e1935. doi: https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae326
12. Rajput S, Dutta A, Rajender S, Mithal A, Chattopadhyay N. Efficacy of antiresorptive agents bisphosphonates and denosumab in mitigating hypercalcemia and bone loss in primary hyperparathyroidism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1098841. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1098841
13. Segula D, Nikolova T, Marks E, Ranganath L, Mishra V. Long Term Outcome of Bisphosphonate Therapy in Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism. Int J Clin Med. 2014;05(14):829-835. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/ijcm.2014.514111
14. Hsieh S-C, Kibret T, Hamid JS, et al. Bisphosphonates for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;2023(9). doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD015008
15. Iwanowska M, Kochman M, Szatko A, Zgliczyński W, Glinicki P. Bone Disease in Primary Hyperparathyroidism-Changes Occurring in Bone Metabolism and New Potential Treatment Strategies. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(21):11639. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252111639
16. Black DM, Greenspan SL, Ensrud KE, Palermo L, McGowan JA, et al. The effects of parathyroid hormone and alendronate alone or in combination in postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(13):1207-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa031975
17. Choe HJ, Koo BK, Yi KH, Kong SH, Kim JH, Shin CS, Chai JW, Kim SW. Skeletal effects of combined bisphosphonates treatment and parathyroidectomy in osteoporotic patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. J Bone Miner Metab. 2022;40(2):292-300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-021-01279-2
18. Arboiro-Pinel R, Mahíllo-Fernández I, Díaz-Curiel M. Bone Analysis Using Trabecular Bone Score and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry-Based 3-Dimensional Modeling in Postmenopausal Women With Primary Hyperparathyroidism. Endocr Pract. 2022;28(1):83-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eprac.2021.08.006
19. Arboiro-Pinel R, Mahillo-Fernández I, Díaz-Curiel M. Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Assessment of the Effects of Parathyroidectomy Using Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry, Trabecular Bone Score, and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry-Based Three-Dimensional Modeling. Endocr Pract. 2024;30(4):340-347. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eprac.2024.01.004
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Pershina-Miliutina A.P., Eremkina A.K., Ozhimalov I.D., Khairieva А.V., Gorbacheva A.M., Ronzhina S.V., Mokrysheva N.G. Effect of preoperative bisphosphonate therapy on bone mineral density in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism one year after parathyroidectomy. Problems of Endocrinology. 2025;71(4):57-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/probl13574

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).