Preview

Problems of Endocrinology

Advanced search

The estimation of the quality of diagnostics of post-menstrual osteoporosis in the Moscow region from the results of a questionnaire study

https://doi.org/10.14341/probl201258123-28

Abstract

The present questionnaire study including female residents of the Moscow region (MR) above the age of 55 years with the confirmed diagnosis of post-menopausal osteoporosis (OP) was designed to obtain an insight into the procedure employed to diagnose post-menopausal OP, categories of specialists involved in diagnostics of this condition, and the methods they use for the purpose. The results of the study indicate that 57.4% of the patients with OP in the first place applied for advice in connection with this disease to an endocrinologist, 19.7% to an orthopedist-traumatologist, 13.% to a rheumatologist, and 4.9% to a neurologist. The endocrinologists referred such patients for bone densitometry and made the diagnosis of post-menopausal osteoporosis in 79% and 70% of the cases respectively. Only a small fraction of orthopedists-traumatologists and rheumatologists practicing in the Moscow region are engaged in diagnostics of post-menopausal osteoporosis as a part of their major activities. At the same time, therapists, gynecologists, and general practitioners do not practically encounter the patients complaining of post-menopausal OP. 38%, 30% and 28% of the respondents reported to have applied to two, three, and one physicians respectively to have the diagnosis of this condition confirmed. However, in the majority of the cases the period from the first visit to a specialist till the establishment of the definitive diagnosis was as long as 1 year (39%). The diagnosis of OP in a small number of the patients was made with the use of a single method, e.g. X-ray densitometry (12%), ultrasonometry (4%), and X-radiography of the skeletal bones (2%). The remaining patients were examined by more than one method; most of them had the primary diagnosis verified by means of X-ray densitometry (77%), blood biochemical analysis (77%), X-radiography of the spinal column (67%), and either by the detection of the serum bone turnover markers or ultrasonometry (16%). The majority of densitometric procedures were performed based at the Moscow Therapeutic and Prophylactic Department and M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute (73% and 17% respectively) for the lack of densitometers in the local medical facilities of the Moscow region.

References

1. Михайлов Е.Е., Беневоленская Л.И., Мылов Н.М. Распространенность переломов позвоночника в популяционной выборке лиц 50 лет и старше. Вестн травматол и ортоп 1997; 3: 20-27.

2. Kanis J.A., Borgstrom F., Zethraeus N. et al. Intervention thresholds for osteoporosis in the UK. Bone 2005; 36: 22.

3. Nguyen T.V., Center J.R., Eisman J.A. Osteoporosis: underrated, underdiagnosed and undertreated. Med J 2004; 180: 18.

4. Kanis J.A., Johnell O. Requirements for DXA for the management of osteoporosis in Europe. Osteoporosis Int 2005; 16: 229-238.

5. Лесняк О.М. Современное состояние проблемы остеопороза в РФ. Российская конференция региональных центров профилактики остеопороза, 3-я. М 2011. http://www.osteoporoz.ru/images/stories/articles/11/5/pr_01.pdf.

6. Kanis J.A., Burlet N., Cooper C. et al. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 2008; 19: 399-428.

7. Миронов С.И., Кораблева Н.Н. Принципы организации амбулаторной помощи больным остеопорозом. Национальный проект "Сила в постоянстве" ЦИТО им. Н.Н. Приорова. РМАПО 2003. http://bonesurgery.ru/view/principy_organizacii_ambulatornoj_pomoschi_bolnym_s_osteoporozom/

8. Кораблева Н.Н. Состояние решения проблемы остеопороза в условиях мегаполиса. Четвертая московская ассамблея "Здоровье столицы". М 2005. http://www.mosmedclinic.ru/conf_library/25/1/41/

9. Johnell O., Kanis J.A. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporosis Int 2006; 17: 1726.

10. Freedman K.B., Kaplan F.S., Bilker W.B. et al. Treatment of osteoporosis: are physicians missing an opportunity? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82-A: 1063.

11. Siris E., Rosen C.J., Harris S.T. et al. Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy: relationship to bone fractures at 24 months in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Mayo Clin Proc 2006; 81: 8: 1013-1022.

12. Sebaldt R., Shane L.G., Pham B.Z. et al. Impact of non-compliance and non-persistence with daily bisphosphonates on longer-term effectiveness outcomes in patients with osteoporosis treated in tertiary specialist care. J Bone Miner Res 2004; 19: Suppl 1: Abstract M 423.

13. Марченкова Л.А., Древаль А.В., Крюкова И.В. и др. Оценка медицинской помощи больным остеопорозом по результатам анкетирования врачей Московской области. Врач 2009; 11: 95-102


Review

For citations:


Dreval' A.V., Marchenkova L.A., Grigor'eva E.A. The estimation of the quality of diagnostics of post-menstrual osteoporosis in the Moscow region from the results of a questionnaire study. Problems of Endocrinology. 2012;58(1):23-28. https://doi.org/10.14341/probl201258123-28

Views: 399


ISSN 0375-9660 (Print)
ISSN 2308-1430 (Online)