Basal insulin analogue versus traditional NPH insulin in basal bolus therapy of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes
https://doi.org/10.14341/probl200753611-15
Abstract
The efficacy and safety of a combination of ultrashort acting insulin aspart (Novorapid) with determir (Levemir) and glargin (Lantus) versus the traditional NPH-insulin (Protafan) used in basal bolus therapy were evaluated in 112 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes 12 and 24 weeks after treatment. According to the type of basal insulin, the patients were divided into 3 groups. A significant decrease in HbA1c levels was revealed in the group of detemir-treated patients. The analogues of basal insulin significantly reduced the risk of hypoglycemias, by simultaneously improving the quality of glycemia control. Their use could cause a significant decrease in the fasting plasma level of glucose, by completely refusing 6.00 extra insulin doses. In the detemir group, the daily dose was increased, by lowering the amount of basal insulin. The dose of dietary insulin underwent changes in the glargin group. Body mass index remained unchanged in the detemir group over 24 weeks of treatment.
About the Authors
O. A. PrikhodinaOmsk Regional Children's Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
S. V. Surikova
Omsk State Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Ya. V. Girsh
Omsk State Medical Academy
Russian Federation
References
1. Дедов И.И., Кураева Т. Л., Петеркова В. А., Щербачева Л. Н. Сахарный диабет у детей и подростков: Руководство для врачей. - М., 2002.
2. Anderson J. et al. // Arch. Intern. Med. - 1997. - Vol. 157. - P. 1249-1255.
3. Barnett A. Р. // Diabet. Med. - 2004. - Vol. 21, N 9. -P. 1057.
4. Basrir E. // Diabetes Care. - 2000. - Vol. 23/9. - P. 1236- 1241.
5. De Leeuw I., Vague P., Selam J. L. // Diabet. Obes. Metab. - 2005. - Vol. 7, N 1. - P. 73-82.
6. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group: The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of longterm complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus // N. Engl. J. Med. - 1993. - Vol. 329. - P. 977-985.
7. Goldman-Levine J. D., Lee K.W. // Ann. Pharmacother. - 2005. - Vol. 39, N 3. - P. 502-507.
8. Kurtzhals P. // Diabct. Metab. - 2005. - Vol. 31, N 4, Pt 2. - P. 4S25-4S33.
9. Lepore M., Pampanelli S., Fanelli С. et al. // Diabetes. - 2000. - Vol. 49, N 12. - P. 2142-2148.
10. Lindholm A., McEwen J., Kits A. // Diabetes Care. - 1999. - Vol. 22. - P. 801-805.
11. Raskin P., Guthrie R. A., Letter L. .. Diabetes Care. - 2000. - Vol. 23. - P. 583-588.
12. Starke A., Heinemann L., Hohlmann A., Berger M. // Diabet. Med. - 1989. - Vol. 6. - P. 239-244.
Review
For citations:
Prikhodina O.A., Surikova S.V., Girsh Ya.V. Basal insulin analogue versus traditional NPH insulin in basal bolus therapy of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Problems of Endocrinology. 2007;53(6):11-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/probl200753611-15

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).