Preview

Problems of Endocrinology

Advanced search

Cockayne syndrome: peculiarities of clinical manifestations and algorithm of observation in childhood

https://doi.org/10.14341/probl13634

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cockayne syndrome is an ultra-rare (1:2.5 million) hereditary disease from the group of progeroid syndromes caused by pathogenic and probable-pathogenic variants in DNA repair genes (ERCC8, ERCC6, XPB (ERCC3), XPD (ERCC2) and XPG (ERCC5)) and characterized by abnormal photosensitivity, congenital cataract, microcephaly, sensorineural hearing loss, nervous system pathology and other multisystem changes. In this manuscript, for the first time in the Russian Federation, we present the results of a clinical and genetic study and follow-up of a Russian cohort of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: During 2 years, from 2023 to 2025, 7 patients with Cockayne syndrome (4 girls and 3 boys) aged from 3 years 11 months to 16 years 3 months were under clinical observation, of whom 3 patients were diagnosed with Cockayne syndrome type A (causative variants in ERCC8 gene) and 4 patients with type B (causative variants in ERCC6 gene). All patients underwent a comprehensive multidisciplinary examination with evaluation of the results of laboratory and instrumental methods of investigation.

RESULTS: Based on observational data, we confirmed the incomplete correlation between genotype and phenotype previously described in the literature. With the genotype of Cockayne syndrome type B, previously correlated with severe course of the disease, only one patient had a severe course of the syndrome, two patients had a moderate course, and one patient had a mild course, indicating the variability of the clinical picture within a single gene lesion, and the severity of the course correlated rather with the age of the disease debut: early onset (before 1 year of age) was associated with faster disease progression. Also, regardless of the genotype and severity of the disease course, major diagnostic criteria were identified in all patients: congenital cataract was diagnosed in 5 of 7 observed patients, sensorineural hearing loss in two patients of moderate and mild course of the disease, progressive pathology of the nervous system in 6 of 7 patients, and microcephaly was diagnosed in all patients.

CONCLUSION: This study expands our understanding of the natural course of Cockayne syndrome and our knowledge of the variability of clinical manifestations and severity of the disease course within a single gene lesion. Timely diagnosis and personalized approach of a multidisciplinary team of specialists can slow the progression of complications and improve the quality of life of patients. The work is of value for physicians of various specialties involved in the diagnosis and treatment of orphan genetic diseases, as well as researchers studying the mechanisms of DNA repair and premature aging.

About the Authors

A. L. Kungurtseva
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation

Anastasiia L. Kungurtseva,

8 Trubetskaya St., bld.2, 119991, Moscow



A. V. Popovich
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation

Anastasiia V. Popovich - MD,

8 Trubetskaya St., bld.2, 119991, Moscow



Yu. V. Tikhonovich
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation

Yulia V. Tikhonovich - MD, PhD,

8 Trubetskaya St., bld.2, 119991, Moscow



T. E. Ivannikova
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation

Tatyana E. Ivannikova - MD, PhD,

8 Trubetskaya St., bld.2, 119991, Moscow



V. A. Kovalskaia
Research Centre for Medical Genetics
Russian Federation

Valeriia A. Kovalskaia,

Moscow



P. A. Vasiliev
Research Centre for Medical Genetics
Russian Federation

Peter A. Vasiliev,

Moscow



A. V. Vitebskaya
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation

Alisa V. Vitebskaya - MD, PhD,

8 Trubetskaya St., bld.2, 119991, Moscow



References

1. Karikkineth AC, Scheibye-Knudsen M, Fivenson E, et al. Cockayne syndrome: Clinical features, model systems and pathways. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;33:3-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2016.08.002

2. Hafsi W, Saleh HM. Cockayne Syndrome. 2024 Jan 11. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024

3. Cockayne EA. Dwarfism with retinal atrophy and deafness. Arch Dis Child. 1936;11(61):1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.11.61.1

4. Laugel V. Cockayne syndrome: the expanding clinical and mutational spectrum. Mech Ageing Dev. 2013;134(5-6):161-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2013.02.006

5. Coles WH. Ocular manifestations of Cockayne's syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969;67(5):762-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(69)91006-x

6. Calmels N, Botta E, Jia N, Fawcett H, Nardo T, et al. Functional and clinical relevance of novel mutations in a large cohort of patients with Cockayne syndrome. J Med Genet. 2018;55(5):329-343. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104877

7. Le Van Quyen P, Calmels N, Bonnière M, Chartier S, Razavi F, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of cerebro-oculo-facio-skeletal syndrome: Report of three fetuses and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet A. 2020;182(5):1236-1242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.61520

8. Van Gool AJ, Citterio E, Rademakers S, et al. The Cockayne syndrome B protein, involved in transcription-coupled DNA repair, resides in an RNA polymerase II-containing complex. EMBO J. 1997;16(19):5955-65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/16.19.5955

9. Fousteri M, Mullenders LH. Transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair in mammalian cells: molecular mechanisms and biological effects. Cell Res. 2008;18(1):73-84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2008.6

10. Venema J, Mullenders LH, Natarajan AT, et al. The genetic defect in Cockayne syndrome is associated with a defect in repair of UV-induced DNA damage in transcriptionally active DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87(12):4707-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.12.4707

11. Henning KA, Li L, Iyer N, et al. The Cockayne syndrome group A gene encodes a WD repeat protein that interacts with CSB protein and a subunit of RNA polymerase II TFIIH. Cell. 1995;82(4):555-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(95)90028-4

12. Mayne LV, Lehmann AR. Failure of RNA synthesis to recover after UV irradiation: an early defect in cells from individuals with Cockayne's syndrome and xeroderma pigmentosum. Cancer Res. 1982;42(4):1473-8

13. Van Hoffen A, Natarajan AT, Mayne LV, et al. Deficient repair of the transcribed strand of active genes in Cockayne's syndrome cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993;21(25):5890-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/21.25.5890

14. Caputo M, Frontini M, Velez-Cruz R, at al. The CSB repair factor is overexpressed in cancer cells, increases apoptotic resistance, and promotes tumor growth. DNA Repair (Amst). 2013;12(4):293-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.01.008

15. Moriwaki S. [Cockayne Syndrome]. Brain Nerve. 2019;71(4):390-393. Japanese. doi: https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.1416201282

16. Scott RJ, Itin P, Kleijer WJ, et al. Xeroderma pigmentosumCockayne syndrome complex in two patients: absence of skin tumors despite severe deficiency of DNA excision repair. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;29(5 Pt 2):883-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0190-9622(93)70263-s

17. Vermeulen W, Scott RJ, Rodgers S, et al. Clinical heterogeneity within xeroderma pigmentosum associated with mutations in the DNA repair and transcription gene ERCC3. Am J Hum Genet. 1994;54(2):191-200

18. Lafforet D, Dupuy JM. Photosensibilité et réparation de l'ADN. Possibilité d'une parenté nosologique entre Xéroderma pigmentosum et syndrome de Cockayne [Photosensitization and DNA repair. Possible nosologic relationship between Xeroderma pigmentosum and Cockayne's syndrome]. Arch Fr Pediatr. 1978;35(10 Suppl):65-74

19. Vermeulen W, Stefanini M, Giliani S, et al. Xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group H falls into complementation group D. Mutat Res. 1991;255(2):201-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8777(91)90054-s

20. Snyder SH. Retraction for Nouspikel et al. A common mutational pattern in Cockayne syndrome patients from xeroderma pigmentosum group G: Implications for a second XPG function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(51):19606. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609759103

21. Vermeulen W, Jaeken J, Jaspers NG, et al. Xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group G associated with Cockayne syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 1993;53(1):185-92

22. Wilson BT, Stark Z, Sutton RE, et al. The Cockayne Syndrome Natural History (CoSyNH) study: clinical findings in 102 individuals and recommendations for care. Genet Med. 2016;18(5):483-93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.110

23. Nance MA, Berry SA. Cockayne syndrome: review of 140 cases. Am J Med Genet. 1992;42(1):68-84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320420115

24. Rapin I, Lindenbaum Y, Dickson DW, et al. Cockayne syndrome and xeroderma pigmentosum. Neurology. 2000;55(10):1442-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.55.10.1442

25. Weidenheim KM, Dickson DW, Rapin I. Neuropathology of Cockayne syndrome: Evidence for impaired development, premature aging, and neurodegeneration. Mech Ageing Dev. 2009;130(9):619-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2009.07.006

26. Crome L, Kanjilal GC. Cockayne's syndrome: case report. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1971;34(2):171-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.34.2.171

27. Hayashi M, Miwa-Saito N, Tanuma N, et al. Brain vascular changes in Cockayne syndrome. Neuropathology. 2012;32(2):113-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1789.2011.01241.x

28. Blin-Rochemaure N, Allani-Essid N, Carlier R, Laugel V, Quijano-Roy S. Place de la neuropathie dans le diagnostic précoce du syndrome de Cockayne: à propos de deux cas dans une fratrie [The place of neuropathy in the early diagnosis of Cockayne syndrome: Report on two siblings]. Arch Pediatr. 2017;24(4):353-359. French. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2016.12.015

29. Laugel V. Cockayne Syndrome. 2000 Dec 28 [updated 2024 Aug 29]. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Amemiya A, editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993–2025

30. Nance MA, Berry SA. Cockayne syndrome: review of 140 cases. Am J Med Genet. 1992;42(1):68-84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320420115

31. Abdel Ghaffar TY, Elsobky ES, Elsayed SM. Cholestasis in patients with Cockayne syndrome and suggested modified criteria for clinical diagnosis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011;6:13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-6-13

32. Wilson BT, Strong A, O'Kelly S, et al. Metronidazole Toxicity in Cockayne Syndrome: A Case Series. Pediatrics. 2015;136(3):e706-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-0531

33. Ataee P, Karimi A, Eftekhari K. Hepatic Failure following Metronidazole in Children with Cockayne Syndrome. Case Rep Pediatr. 2020;2020:9634196. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9634196

34. Ben Chehida A, Ghali N, Ben Abdelaziz R, et al. Renal Involvement in 2 Siblings With Cockayne Syndrome. Iran J Kidney Dis. 2017;11(3):253-255

35. Stern-Delfils A, Spitz MA, Durand M, et al. Renal disease in Cockayne syndrome. Eur J Med Genet. 2020;63(1):103612. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.01.002

36. Wang S, Min Z, Ji Q, et al. Rescue of premature aging defects in Cockayne syndrome stem cells by CRISPR/Cas9- mediated gene correction. Protein Cell. 2020;11(1):1-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-019-0623-2


Supplementary files

1. Figure 1. Development of the phenotype characteristic of Cockayne syndrome in patient #1 in the first years of life: a) 1 year; b) 2 years; c) 3 years 6 months; d) 8 years 3 months
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (904KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
2. Figure 2. Phenotype characteristic of Cockayne syndrome in patient #2 at 9 years 5 months
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (497KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
3. Figure 3. Phenotype characteristic of Cockayne syndrome in patient #3 at 13 years 2 months.
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (506KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
4. Figure 4. Phenotype characteristic of Cockayne syndrome in patient #4 at 3 years 11 months.
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (451KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
5. Figure 5. Carinatum: a) patient #1; b) Patient No. 4
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (405KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
6. Figure 6. Phenotype characteristic of Cockayne syndrome in patient No. 7 at 16 years 3 months.
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (393KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
7. Figure 7. Congenital vertical talus (post-Achilloplasty condition).
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (425KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾

Review

For citations:


Kungurtseva A.L., Popovich A.V., Tikhonovich Yu.V., Ivannikova T.E., Kovalskaia V.A., Vasiliev P.A., Vitebskaya A.V. Cockayne syndrome: peculiarities of clinical manifestations and algorithm of observation in childhood. Problems of Endocrinology. 2026;72(1):115-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/probl13634

Views: 1929

JATS XML

ISSN 0375-9660 (Print)
ISSN 2308-1430 (Online)