Insulin glargine 300 U/ml in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: results of the EDITION program (review)

Unmet medical needs in basal insulin therapy include late initiation of therapy, hypoglycemia, and low patient compliance. Introduction of new basal insulin may cater to these unmet medical needs.

New insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) (Toujeo) is a long-acting basal insulin with a more even and prolonged PK/PD profile compared to those of insulin glargine 100 (Lantus). The glucose infusion rate profiles and insulin concentration of Gla-300 were more constant and more evenly distributed over 24 h compared to those of glargine 100 U/mL. Stable blood glucose control (≤ 5.5 mmol/L) was maintained approximately 5 h longer with glargine 300 U/mL compared to glargine 100 U/mL. The difference in PK/PD profiles of glargine 300 U/mL and glargine 100 U/mL may be a key to explanation of the Toujeo® clinical features demonstrated in the EDITION program.

This review discusses the EDITION clinical program results in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2MD) patients, except EDITION JP2: on previous basal-bolus therapy (EDITION 1, n=807), previous basal insulin in combination with oral anti-diabetic drug (EDITION 2, n=811), and insulin naive patients (oral anti-diabetic drug excl. SU) (EDITION 3, n=878). The EDITION program was aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of Gla-300 compared to those of glargine 100 U/mL. EDITION programs were multicenter, 1:1 randomized, open-label, parallel group, phase III, and non-inferiority studies, with similar designs and endpoints. The primary endpoint was the non-inferiority of Gla-300 vs glargine 100 U/mL, which was estimated as a HbA_1c reduction at 6 months. The main secondary endpoint was the percentage of participants with one or more nocturnal confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/L) or severe hypoglycemic events from week 9 to month 6 of treatment. Patients were randomized to glargine 300 U/mL or glargine 100 U/mL once a day, with dose titration seeking fasting plasma glucose of 4.4—5.6 mmol/L.

Non-inferiority of glargine 300 U/mL in the HbA_1C reduction vs glargine 100 U/mL was confirmed in EDITION 1, EDITION 2, and EDITION 3 studies. According to the results of a pool analysis of these three trials, annualized rates of confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/L) or severe hypoglycemia were lower with glargine 300 U/mL than with glargine 100 U/mL during the night (31% difference in the rate ratio over 6 months, p=0.0002) and at any time (24 h, 14% difference, p=0.0116). Severe hypoglycemia at any time was rare (glargine 300 U/mL: 2.3%; glargine 100 U/mL: 2.6%). Weight gain was low (<1 kg) in both groups, with the gain being less with glargine 300 U/ml [LS mean difference —0.28 kg (95% CI –0.55 to –0.01); p=0.039]. Both treatments were well tolerated, having similar rates of adverse events.

In conclusion, glargine 300 U/mL was characterized by the non-inferior efficacy compared to glargine 100 U/mL, a better safety profile (reduced hypoglycemia), and lower weight gain. These advantages may allow for more active insulin dose titration in real clinical practice, contribute to better-sustained glycemic control and patient compliance, and, consequently, improve the prognosis and clinical outcome.

: type 2 mellitus diabetes, basal insulin, glargine 300 u/ml

1. Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В., Галстян Г.Р., и др. Распространенность сахарного диабета 2-го типа у взрослого населения России (исследование Nation) // Сахарный Диабет. — 2016. — Т. 19. — №2. — C. 104—112. [Dedov II, Shestakova MV, Galstyan GG. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the adult population of Russia (Nation Study). Diabetes Mellitus. 2016;19(2):104-112. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.14341/dm2004116-17

2. International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes Atlas. 7th Edition. 2015.

3. Fowler MJ. Microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes. Clin Diabetes. 2008;26(2):77-82. doi: 10.2337/diaclin.26.2.77

4. Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В., Галстян Г.Р., и др. Алгоритмы специализированной медицинской помощи больным сахарным диабетом. Под ред. Дедова И.И., Шестаковой М.В. (7-й вып.) // Сахарный диабет. — 2015. — Т. 18. – №1S. — C. 1—112. [Dedov II, Shestakova MV, Galstyan GR, et al. Standards of specialized diabetes care. Edited by Dedov I.I., Shestakova M.V. (7th edition). Diabetes mellitus. 2015;18(1S):1-112. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.14341/dm20151s1-112

5. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014;38(1):140-149. doi: 10.2337/dc14-2441

6. Li C, Ford ES, Zhao G, et al. Trends of insulin use among US adults with type 2 diabetes: the behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 1995—2007. J Diabetes Complications. 2012;26(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2011.11.005

7. Khunti K, Damci T, Meneghini L, et al. Study of once daily levemir (SOLVE): insights into the timing of insulin initiation in people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2012;14(7):654-661. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01602.x

8. Handelsman Y, Mechanick JI, Blonde L, et al. American association of clinical endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for developing a diabetes mellitus comprehensive care plan. Endocr Pract. 2011;17:Suppl 2:1-53.

9. Khunti K, Wolden ML, Thorsted BL, et al. Clinical inertia in people with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study of more than 80,000 people. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(11):3411-3417. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0331

10. Paul SK, Klein K, Thorsted BL, et al. Delay in treatment intensification increases the risks of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14:100. doi: 10.1186/s12933-015-0260-x

11. Brown JB, Nichols GA, Perry A. The burden of treatment failure in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(7):1535-1540. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.7.1535

12. Korytkowski M. When oral agents fail: practical barriers to starting insulin. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002;26:Suppl 3:S18-S24. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802173

13. Ahren B. Avoiding hypoglycemia: a key to success for glucose-lowering therapy in type 2 diabetes. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2013;9:155-163. doi: 10.2147/vhrms33934

14. Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Lauritzen T, et al. Resistance to insulin therapy among patients and providers: results of the cross-national diabetes attitudes, wishes, and needs (DAWN) study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(11):2673-2679. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.11.2673

15. Diago-Cabezudo JI, Madec-Hily A, Aslam A. Perceptions of hypoglycemia and self-monitoring of blood glucose in insulin-treated diabetes patients: results from a European online survey. Diabetes Management. 2013;3(1):15-23. doi: 10.2217/dmt.12.66

16. Willis WD, Diago-Cabezudo JI, Madec-Hily A, Aslam A. Medical resource use, disturbance of daily life and burden of hypoglycemia in insulin-treated patients with diabetes: results from a European online survey. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;13(1):123-130. doi: 10.1586/erp.12.80

17. Shah VN, Moser EG, Blau A, et al. The future of basal insulin. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013;15(9):727-732. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0228

18. Cukierman-Yaffe T, Bosch J, Diaz R, et al. Effects of basal insulin glargine and omega-3 fatty acid on cognitive decline and probable cognitive impairment in people with dysglycaemia: a substudy of the ORIGIN trial. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. 2014;2(7):562-572. doi: 10.1016/s2213-8587(14)70062-2

19. Gilbert RE, Mann JFE, Hanefeld M, et al. Basal insulin glargine and microvascular outcomes in dysglycaemic individuals: results of the outcome reduction with an initial glargine intervention (ORIGIN) trial. Diabetologia. 2014;57(7):1325-1331. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3238-4

20. Lonn EM, Bosch J, Diaz R, et al. Effect of insulin glargine and n-3FA on carotid intima—media thickness in people with dysglycemia at high risk for cardiovascular events. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(9):2466-2474. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2129

21. Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Gerich J. The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(11):3080-3086. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.11.3080

22. Steinstraesser A, Schmidt R, Bergmann K, et al. Investigational new insulin glargine 300 U/ml has the same metabolism as insulin glargine 100 U/ml. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2014;16(9):873-876. doi: 10.1111/dom.12283

23. Becker RHA, Dahmen R, Bergmann K, et al. New insulin glargine 300 units (middle dot)mL-1 provides a more even activity profile and prolonged glycemic control at teady state compared with insulin glargine 100 units (middle dot)mL-1. Diabetes Care. 2014. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0006

24. Becker RHA, Nowotny I, Teichert L, et al. Low within- and between-day variability in exposure to new insulin glargine 300 U/ml. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2015;17(3):261-267. doi: 10.1111/dom.12416

25. Ritzel R, Roussel R, Bolli GB, et al. Patient-level meta-analysis of the EDITION 1, 2 and 3 studies: glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia with new insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2015;17(9):859-867. doi: 10.1111/dom.12485

26. Goldman J, White JR. New insulin glargine 300 U/mL for the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Pharmacother. 2015;49(10):1153-1161. doi: 10.1177/1060028015597915

27. Riddle MC, Bolli GB, Ziemen M, et al. New insulin glargine 300 Units/mL versus glargine 100 Units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using basal and mealtime insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 1). Diabetes Care. 2014;37(10):2755-2762. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0991

28. Yki-Järvinen H, Bergenstal R, Ziemen M, et al. New insulin glargine 300 Units/mL versus glargine 100 Units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using oral agents and basal insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 2). Diabetes Care. 2014;37(12):3235-3243. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0990

29. Bolli GB, Riddle MC, Bergenstal RM, et al. New insulin glargine 300 U/ml compared with glargine 100 U/ml in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes on oral glucose-lowering drugs: a randomized controlled trial (EDITION 3). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2015;17(4):386-394. doi: 10.1111/dom.12438

30. Twigg SM, Escalada J, Grisoni M, et al. Age, BMI, and diabetes duration: effect on glycemic control and hypoglycemia with insulin glargine 300 U/mL in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) [abstract no. 1017-P]. Diabetes. 2015;64(Suppl 1):A260. Available at: https://www.mednet.nl/wosmedia/2921/twigg_et_al_effect.pdf

31. Jeandidier, N, Riddle MC, Bolli GB, et al. New insulin glargine 300 U/ml: efficacy and safety of flexible vs fixed dosing intervals in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.) [abstract no. 961]. Diabetologia 2014;57(Suppl. 1):S393. Available at: http://www.easdvirtualmeeting.org/resources/new-insulin-glargine-300-u-ml-efficacy-and-safety-of-flexible-vs-fixed-dosing-intervals-in-people-with-type-2-diabetes-mellitus-2

32. Riddle MC, Yki-Järvinen H, Bolli GB, et al. One-year sustained glycaemic control and less hypoglycaemia with new insulin glargine 300 U/ml compared with 100 U/ml in people with type 2 diabetes using basal plus meal-time insulin: the EDITION 1 12-month randomized trial, including 6-month extension. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2015;17(9):835-842. doi: 10.1111/dom.12472

33. Tong L, Wang H, Gupta S, et al. Effect of switching to insulin glargine 300 U/ML on clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a medical chart-review in the US. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.kantarhealth.com/docs/publications-citations/tong-wang-gupta-et-al-switching-basal-insulin-to-toujeo-in-t2d---amcp-nexus-2016.pdf?sfvrsn=0